Newsmax, the conservative cable network, has agreed to pay $67 million to settle a defamation lawsuit filed by Dominion Voting Systems. The lawsuit alleged that Newsmax spread false claims suggesting Dominion’s voting machines were responsible for rigging the 2020 U.S. presidential election outcome against former President Trump. Newsweek
A Delaware Superior Court judge had earlier ruled that Newsmax’s content was defamatory, though the case was headed to a jury trial that would determine whether malice was involved and what damages should be awarded. Newsmax reached the settlement before the trial began. AP News
The $67 million settlement is within reach through an installment plan—$27 million paid upfront followed by two annual payments of $20 million each in 2026 and 2027—according to filings and reporting. Politico
This resolution follows a similar, larger settlement made by Fox News in 2023, which paid Dominion $787.5 million for comparable false election-related claims. Earlier, Newsmax had also settled a separate defamation lawsuit with Smartmatic (another voting-machine provider) for $40 million. startribune.com
Despite entering into this settlement, Newsmax maintains that its coverage adhered to professional journalism standards and that securing a fair trial in Delaware would have been unlikely. They characterized the lawsuit as a threat to press freedom. Dominion, for its part, expressed satisfaction with the outcome. Reuters
Key Points
- Settlement amount: $67 million—Newsmax to pay over three installments.
- Legal context: Judge ruled statements were defamatory; the trial, focused on malice and damages, was avoided by settlement.
- Historical backdrop: This follows Fox News’ $787.5 million settlement with Dominion, and Newsmax’s prior $40 million settlement with Smartmatic.
- Positions: Newsmax claims integrity of reporting; Dominion considers the settlement a victory.
Future Projections
1. Media Accountability
Newsmax’s settlement adds to growing pressure on media organizations to adhere to factual coverage—particularly around election integrity. The escalating costs of defamation claims may incentivize tighter editorial oversight.
2. Deterrence Effect
With high-profile settlements across multiple outlets, there may be a chilling effect on the spread of unfounded election-related conspiracy theories, including in broadcast and online media.
3. Investor and Corporate Repercussions
Newsmax’s financial commitment may affect its balance sheet, shareholder confidence, and future investments. The partial reallocation of funds may result in operational adjustments or changes in programming priorities.
4. Legal Precedent
The aggregation of large settlements across Fox and Newsmax could influence jurisprudence around “actual malice” standards and defamation defenses in media law. Judicial attention may increase scrutiny on internal editorial communications as evidence in future cases.
5. Public Perception & Trust
While Newsmax frames the settlement as protecting its editorial integrity, public discourse may lean toward viewing it as an admission of error. Trust in Newsmax—and the broader media environment—could remain delicate.
Neutral Reflection
This settlement underscores a significant moment in U.S. media, where false narratives around election integrity have triggered substantial legal consequences. Both the sheer size of the settlement and the litany of similar cases signal growing legal and public intolerance for disinformation. Moving forward, the interplay between media responsibility, free speech, and accountability is likely to sharpen.
Leave feedback about this
You must be logged in to post a comment.